WASHINGTON, D.C. – FIFA President Gianni Infantino has awarded the inaugural FIFA Peace Prize to United States President Donald Trump during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Draw ceremony, held at the Kennedy Center on 5 December.
The announcement, made moments before the group stage draw, has ignited widespread debate over the legitimacy and timing of the new accolade.
The prize, introduced only weeks ago, is intended to recognise individuals who have made “exceptional contributions to peace and unity.” Infantino described Trump’s role as “extraordinary,” citing his efforts in international diplomacy.
“Thank you very much. This is truly one of the great honours of my life. And beyond awards, Gianni and I were discussing this, we saved millions and millions of lives,” Trump said upon receiving the award.
Critics, however, have questioned both the creation of the award and its recipient. Human rights organisations had urged FIFA not to proceed, arguing that the governing body risked politicising football.
The timing has also raised eyebrows, as Trump was recently overlooked for the Nobel Peace Prize, which instead went to Venezuelan democracy campaigner Maria Corina Machado.
Observers note that Infantino and Trump have cultivated a close relationship in recent years, particularly since the United States secured co-hosting rights for the 2026 FIFA World Cup alongside Canada and Mexico.
Some analysts suggest the award may serve as a symbolic gesture of gratitude, while others view it as an attempt to bolster Trump’s international standing.
The ceremony itself was marked by grandeur, with dignitaries from across the footballing world present. Yet the spotlight quickly shifted from the draw to the unexpected award.
FIFA’s decision has prompted questions about whether the organisation should be involved in political recognition, especially given its stated mission to remain neutral and focused on sport.
Reactions have been mixed. Supporters of Trump hailed the award as overdue recognition of his diplomatic initiatives, while critics accused FIFA of undermining its credibility.
Commentators in Europe and Latin America have particularly voiced concern that the prize could set a precedent for football’s governing body to intervene in political matters.
The controversy underscores the delicate balance between sport and politics. While FIFA has long promoted football as a tool for unity, the introduction of a peace prize and its immediate presentation to a sitting US president has sparked debate over whether the organisation is venturing beyond its remit.
As the World Cup approaches, attention will inevitably return to the competition itself. Yet the inaugural FIFA Peace Prize has ensured that discussions surrounding the 2026 tournament will not only focus on football, but also on the intersection of global sport, diplomacy, and political symbolism.
Sources: FIFA, TRT World
